| Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5 6 7 8 9 |
41. AFK Cloaking Collection Thread - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Nikk Narrel wrote: Here is another perspective that might help. Reasonable: The ability to place destructible infrastructure that notifies a channel when a gate has been activated. It could go so far as to cross reference friendly transponder ...
- by Vas Eldryn - at 2013.11.12 06:30:00
|
42. AFK Cloaking Collection Thread - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Teckos Pech wrote: Womyn Power wrote: omg nerf op claoking plz cp give it a fuel cost or somthing i cant even rat Fuel would nerf active cloaking too. That you cannot handlean AFK cloaker is your problem, not the problem of everyone who ...
- by Vas Eldryn - at 2013.11.11 02:30:00
|
43. AFK Cloaking Collection Thread - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
CCP is actually making it easier for interceptors and interdictors to catch a battleship with the warp speed changes, been listening to the arguments on the test server page..... some are saying the changes make dictors and ceptors too OP. I'm no...
- by Vas Eldryn - at 2013.11.05 03:29:00
|
44. AFK Cloaking Collection Thread - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Altrue wrote: People do bad things that they shouldn't do sometimes, like ratting in a supercarrier. Afk cloaking is the one of the only things able to counter that. So if you don't like afk cloaking, you surely are doing something you souldn...
- by Vas Eldryn - at 2013.10.22 08:44:00
|
45. AFK Cloaking Collection Thread - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
ahh cool thanks for the link! been looking for that! It doesn't really mention whether the limited range jammer would defend against cov-ops cyno's or operate like its bigger brother (the system jammer). my guess is it would be like the system j...
- by Vas Eldryn - at 2013.10.22 03:28:00
|
46. AFK Cloaking Collection Thread - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
I cant find much info on the "limited range cyno jammer", although on the rubicon site it does mention the following: "Guerilla-style Warfare Support - Tactics to chip away at the behemoths have surfaced, allowing small fleets of mercenaries, sab...
- by Vas Eldryn - at 2013.10.22 02:33:00
|
47. get rid of the tier 3 bc !!!!!!!!!!! - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Suicide gankers don't need tornadoes, if they where removed.... they would just use thrashers or hurricanes (I see more thrasher suicide attacks as they are stupidly cheap... you just need a bigger gang.) I don't see CCP removing a ship just beca...
- by Vas Eldryn - at 2013.10.22 01:54:00
|
48. Assualt carriers? - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Omnathious Deninard wrote: Oxide Ammar wrote: Omnathious Deninard wrote: Dominix Stop shoving Dominix every time some asking or suggesting dedicated drone ship line. The Dominix is a dedicated drone ship. The Vexor is not. The Vexo...
- by Vas Eldryn - at 2013.10.19 09:24:00
|
49. Assualt carriers? - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
been thinking a lot since I started this post.... and I would love to see this ship in either a t2 BS with deployment mode for small fleet / gang support and a drone increase... or a small capital with good fleet support and decent drone abilities...
- by Vas Eldryn - at 2013.10.19 07:27:00
|
50. Assualt carriers? - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Danika Princip wrote: Vas Eldryn wrote: Danika Princip wrote: Adam Zalonis wrote: Caleb Seremshur wrote: I'm not really sure how a mini carrier that possesses no distinctive advantage over a traditional carrier would be worth making...
- by Vas Eldryn - at 2013.10.19 05:37:00
|
51. Assualt carriers? - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Adam Zalonis wrote: Caleb Seremshur wrote: I'm not really sure how a mini carrier that possesses no distinctive advantage over a traditional carrier would be worth making. I get the feeling you're seeking a super domi. Why not? A series ...
- by Vas Eldryn - at 2013.10.19 05:24:00
|
52. Assualt carriers? - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Danika Princip wrote: Adam Zalonis wrote: Caleb Seremshur wrote: I'm not really sure how a mini carrier that possesses no distinctive advantage over a traditional carrier would be worth making. I get the feeling you're seeking a super dom...
- by Vas Eldryn - at 2013.10.19 05:14:00
|
53. Assualt carriers? - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Caleb Seremshur wrote: I'm not really sure how a mini carrier that possesses no distinctive advantage over a traditional carrier would be worth making. I get the feeling you're seeking a super domi. not really... I was just looking at ships ...
- by Vas Eldryn - at 2013.10.19 04:47:00
|
54. Assualt carriers? - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
yeah I thought of that... though I don't have a PS3 and know very little about dust, so I couldn't really comment on that.
- by Vas Eldryn - at 2013.10.19 03:43:00
|
55. Assualt carriers? - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
the dominix is a BS and doesn't have hangers / maintenance bays and cant really fit the role of an assault carrier.
- by Vas Eldryn - at 2013.10.19 03:28:00
|
56. Assualt carriers? - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Just was thinking of a smaller carrier... much like, in modern navies, the America class, Wasp class, Canberra class, HMS ocean, etc. Classified as assault carriers, or amphibious assault ships they are notably smaller then carriers, but fill a vi...
- by Vas Eldryn - at 2013.10.19 03:14:00
|
57. AFK Cloaking Collection Thread - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Teckos Pech wrote: Vas Eldryn wrote: Teckos Pech wrote: Vas Eldryn wrote: I'm not just going of that one post of yours .... yes I've read it... i've also read the ridiculous links in your signature and many of your previous posts! you...
- by Vas Eldryn - at 2013.10.18 05:57:00
|
58. AFK Cloaking Collection Thread - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Teckos Pech wrote: Vas Eldryn wrote: I'm not just going of that one post of yours .... yes I've read it... i've also read the ridiculous links in your signature and many of your previous posts! you want to make null sec more dangerous and P...
- by Vas Eldryn - at 2013.10.18 03:13:00
|
59. AFK Cloaking Collection Thread - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
I'm not just going of that one post of yours .... yes I've read it... i've also read the ridiculous links in your signature and many of your previous posts! you want to make null sec more dangerous and PVE ships in null more vulnerable... but you...
- by Vas Eldryn - at 2013.10.17 05:42:00
|
60. AFK Cloaking Collection Thread - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Nikk Narrel wrote: Vas Eldryn wrote: You want mining / ratting ships to be more vulnerable but AFK cloaked ships to remain invulnerable while AFK and even more invisible by removing them from local. So you want more risk in null by keeping a...
- by Vas Eldryn - at 2013.10.17 01:54:00
|
| Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5 6 7 8 9 |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |